As a Dedicated Capitalist, But Universal Medicare Is the Top Solution for US Health System
Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.
Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.
Our Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly
Based on a recent study, the average family pays $27,000 annually on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to surpass $17,000 for each worker in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.
Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.
When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?
When will we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this can't continue.
I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.
The Way Universal Coverage Could Function
A national health insurance program would need payments from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. The company pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.
Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the difference decreases.
Implementation for America
For America, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework already established. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. And, like much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors instead of a government office.
Advantages for Small Businesses
A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render administration much easier (a payroll deduction remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).
It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complex (and ineffective) process of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Due to simplification, there would be improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.
Capitalist Perspective
I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs that employ more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.
Considering Challenges
Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, despite the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.
Need for Realistic Evaluation
We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we take a hard look at ourselves and agree that major reforms are necessary.